Home / 32 GB

32 GB · RTX 5090 32 GB

Mia's one-click kit: Qwen3.8-27B, EXL3 4.0 bpw + MTP

1x RTX 5090 32 GB

ExLlamaV3 1.6.0 (Mia one-click kit bbb11db), DRAFT=mtpcommit bbb11db1 GPUmeasured 2026-10-19independent check passed
Rank in 32 GB
1of 1
Overall score
88.8/ 100
Speed
45.0/ 45
Quality
30.0/ 30
Browser check
3.8/ 5
My rating
10.0/ 20

Overall score as of 20 Oct 2026. This is the only complete run in the class so far, so it is rank 1. Scores are relative to the best run in the class today; a better model later moves older runs down.

How the overall score is calculated
PartThis runBest in classRelativeWeightPoints
Speeddecode 149.3 tok/sbest 149.3 tok/s100.0 %45 %45.0
Qualitymean of 7 tests: 67.6 %best mean 67.6 %100.0 %30 %30.0
Browser check7.5 of 1075.0 %5 %3.8
My rating5 of 1050.0 %20 %10.0
Overall100 %88.8

The seven quality tests: MMLU-Pro 59.3 · GPQA 43.9 · IFEval 85.5 · LiveCodeBench 60.0 · long text 8K 87.5 · long text 32K 70.0 · GPQA 30 with thinking 66.7.

Speed and quality are relative to the best run of this class, the browser check and my rating are out of 10. The parts are rounded one by one. sparkDash, the memory test and speculative-decoding numbers are not part of it. How the score is made, and the assumption behind it.

Build test

What it builds as an agent

Task: Airship dock (3D scene, one HTML file). One attempt, no help. Counted: the final file counts.

Browser check
7.5/ 10
My rating
5/ 10
Time
61.6min
Tokens
129,606
Harness
DeepSeek Harness 0.1.3-alpha.2
Screen recording of the page this run built, made in Chrome after the run. The page files are unchanged. Still image

Play it yourself

Open full screen

AI-generated The page this setup built, running live in your browser: click into it and use the controls it shows itself (usually drag to look around, scroll to zoom). It needs WebGL and can be slow on a weak graphics card.

The browser check

  • page loads without page error1 / 1
  • window.ready === true within 30 s1 / 1
  • no console errors (whole session)1 / 1
  • frame is not blank1 / 1
  • frame rate in software GL (rAF over 5 s)0 / 1
  • required objects (voxel mass, >=3 steam emitters, >=2 airships, label)1.5 / 2
  • motion: pixel diff 0.5, >=3 rotating nodes 0.5, large group translating 12 / 2
  • OrbitControls: drag and wheel change the picture beyond the animation baseline0 / 1

Measured 2026-10-19. Raw files: check · run info · command · final choice · contract · sampling · screenshot · clip.mp4 · web.mp4 · web-poster.jpg.

The run's own headless check browser, which renders the page the model built, used up to 1517 % CPU. The load monitor counted it as another process.

Exact command we measured withfor reproducing↓

You do not need this to run the model. It is the exact command of our measurement, so anyone can repeat the result.

Build test (run show-r0)
run_showcase.sh --harness dsh-a2 --task K1 --upstream http://127.0.0.1:43437/v1 --model qwen3.8-27b-exl3-4.0bpw --sampling-file $RUN/sampling-show.json --out $RUN/raw/tag-1910-show-r0/show --limit-s 7200 --inject-after-s 5400 --poll-s 20 --ctx 262144
Speed v2

How fast it runs

Decode
149.3tok/s
Decode, code
154.5tok/s
Decode, prose
144.2tok/s
500 words
≈ 4.8s
Prefill at 8K
3483.8tok/s
First token at 2K
0.6s
MeasurementResult
Decode149.3 tok/s
Words per second104.8 words/s
Characters per second694.7 chars/s
Spread of the decode runs (CV)4.3 %
Decode, window 1151.6 tok/s
Prefill at 2K3341.5 tok/s
Prefill at 8K3483.8 tok/s
Prefill at 32K3115.9 tok/s
Time to first token at 2K0.6 s
Time to first token at 8K2.4 s
Time to first token at 32K10.5 s
1 request at once (total)138.8 tok/s
Long answer, wall time41.5 s
Decode, code prompt154.5 tok/s
Decode, prose prompt144.2 tok/s
Spread of the code runs (CV)4.3 %
Spread of the prose runs (CV)1.9 %

Method: code+prose; 2 run(s) each; 512 tokens; 1 warm-up(s); median. Measured 2026-10-19. Raw files: speed result · speed contract · log · long answer.

Exact command we measured withfor reproducing↓

You do not need this to run the model. It is the exact command of our measurement, so anyone can repeat the result.

Speed v2 (run speed-r0)
python3 speed2.py --base-url http://127.0.0.1:45445/v1 --label run-speed-r0 --prompts $BENCH/repos/rigmark-v2/prompts-v2.json --output $RUN/raw/tag-1910-speed-r0/run-speed-r0/speed2 --contract $RUN/raw/tag-1910-speed-r0/run-speed-r0/speed2/speed-contract.json --parts decode,prefill,conc,l1 --prefill-depths 2048,8192,32768 --prompt-ids code,prose --runs 2 --max-tokens 512 --warmups 1 --prefill-runs 3 --tokenizer-json $HOME/not published --tokenizer-python $HOME/hfvenv/bin/python --sampling {"temperature": 0.7, "top_p": 0.8, "top_k": 20, "min_p": 0.0, "presence_penalty": 1.5} --sampling-source https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B README.md lines 252 (Thinking Mode) and 253 (Instruct/non-thinking mode), local copy not published line 252-253 (not published) --model qwen3.8-27b-exl3-4.0bpw --no-cache-prompt --server-log $RUN/logs/server-A.log --engine-version-file $RUN/logs/engine-version.txt
Quality v2

How well it answers

TestResult95 % marginRightCut offcount as wrongRaw files
MMLU-Pro
400 fixed questions, letter only
59.3 % ± 4.8 pts237 / 4000answers · summary · log · contractcommand
GPQA Diamond
198 questions, letter only
43.9 % ± 6.9 pts87 / 1980answers · summary · log · contractcommand
IFEval
200 fixed prompts, strict
85.5 % ± 4.9 pts171 / 2001answers · summary · log · contractcommand
LiveCodeBench
40 newest tasks, the code runs
60.0 % ± 14.5 pts24 / 402summary · log · contractcommand
Long text 8K
4 tasks x 10 at 8192 tokens
87.5 % ± 10.3 pts35 / 400log · contract · answers · summarycommand
Long text 32K
4 tasks x 10 at 32768 tokens
70.0 % ± 13.7 pts28 / 400log · contract · answers · summarycommand
GPQA 30, thinking on
30 questions, limit 16,384 tokens
66.7 % ± 16.0 pts
median 5,572 tokens, 37.1 s per question
20 / 309log · contract · summarycommand

Thinking off, except the last test. Seed 42. Sampling from the model card. A cut-off answer counts as wrong. Measured 2026-10-19.

Exact commands we measured withfor reproducing↓

You do not need this to run the model. It is the exact command of our measurement, so anyone can repeat the result.

MMLU-Pro (run inst-r11)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts mmlupro --job nacht-1910
GPQA Diamond (run inst-r11)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts gpqa --job nacht-1910
IFEval (run inst-r11)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts ifeval --job nacht-1910
LiveCodeBench (run inst-r11)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts lcb --job nacht-1910
Long text 8K (run inst-r11)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts ruler --job nacht-1910
Long text 32K (run inst-r11)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts ruler --job nacht-1910
GPQA 30, thinking on (run think-r10)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts think --job nacht-1910
Memory test

How much context fits

Largest size tested
131,072tokens
Peak memory
18.95GiB
Decode at that size
106.2tok/s
Context sizePrompttokensFilledFirst tokenPrefilltok/s, as the server reports itDecodetok/sPeak memoryGiBResult
4K 4,096 tokens3,79892.7 %0.7 s5,686133.116.28answered (stop)
8K 8,192 tokens7,75094.6 %1.3 s6,011135.816.35answered (stop)
16K 16,384 tokens15,79896.4 %3.7 s4,234125.216.50answered (stop)
32K 32,768 tokens31,60496.4 %9.0 s3,495173.016.80answered (stop)
64K 65,536 tokens62,73395.7 %21.8 s2,873120.617.51answered (stop)
128K 131,072 tokens125,89296.0 %57.6 s2,185106.218.95answered (stop)

Memory test. For each context size (4K, 8K, 16K ... up to the largest size tested for the setup) the server is started again with that context, one prompt that fills about 95 % of the context is sent, and the model must answer. The largest size that loaded and answered counts. Decode speed is measured on that answer at the largest size. Peak memory is the GPU memory in use (nvidia-smi); the GPU was empty before each start. Measured 2026-10-20. Raw files: result of every step · log · contract.

Note from the run: The list of sizes ends at 128K (131,072 tokens), so this is the largest size tested, not the largest size the setup can load: the recipe's own default context is 262,144. The decode speed is one answer of 74 tokens at 128K; the six sizes range from 106 to 173 tok/s.

Exact command we measured withfor reproducing↓

You do not need this to run the model. It is the exact command of our measurement, so anyone can repeat the result.

Memory test (run fit-r0)
bash tools/quality2/measure_all.sh tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json --parts fit --job plan-2010
Credits

Also made this possible

Setup

Run it yourself

What you need and how to start it, step by step. The results below come from exactly this setup.

What you need

Hardware
1x RTX 5090 32 GB
System
Linux (we used the Linux start script)
Model
turboderp/Qwen3.8-27B-exl3 4.00bpw
Quant (EXL3)
huggingface.co/turboderp/Qwen3.8-27B-exl3
Engine
ExLlamaV3 1.6.0 — the program that loads the model and answers requestsBuild and settings we used: ExLlamaV3 1.6.0 (Mia one-click kit bbb11db), DRAFT=mtp
Recipe (one-click kit)
github.com/MiaAI-Lab/Qwen3.8-27B-16gb-NVIDIA-GPUs-one-click-install by Mia (MiaAI-Lab)
Context window
262,144 tokens: how much text the model can see at once

Steps

  1. Get the recipe and the model files from the list above. We ran the engine, ExLlamaV3 1.6.0, with the recipe (Mia one-click kit bbb11db).

  2. Put these settings into the recipe's .env file. One setting per line.

    MODEL_DIR=models/Qwen3.8-27B-EXL3-4.0bpw
    CONTEXT_SIZE=262144
    CACHE_QUANT=4
    GPU_MEM_GB=22.8
    DRAFT=mtp
    PROFILE=4.0bpw-262k
  3. Start the server with this command. It loads the model into memory.

    CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID \
      CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 bash linux/start.sh \
      --no-harness \
      --no-pick

    What the parts mean

    • CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_IDcounts the GPUs in slot order, the same order nvidia-smi shows
    • CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0which NVIDIA GPU the program may use: the number of the GPU in our machine (with one GPU it is 0)
    • MODEL_DIR=models/Qwen3.8-27B-EXL3-4.0bpwthe folder with the model files
    • CONTEXT_SIZE=262144the context window in tokens: how much text the model can see at once
    • DRAFT=mtpMTP (multi-token prediction): the model guesses several tokens ahead and checks them, which makes answers faster
    • CACHE_QUANT=4keeps the context memory (KV cache) in 4 bits, which uses less GPU memory
    • GPU_MEM_GB=22.8how much GPU memory, in GB, the kit plans with
    • PROFILE=4.0bpw-262kthe name of the kit profile these settings belong to; the name gives the bits per weight and the context size
Exact command we measured withfor reproducing↓

You do not need this to run the model. It is the start text exactly as our run recorded it, with the engine build in front, so anyone can repeat the result.

Start, as recorded with the run
ExLlamaV3 1.6.0 (Mia one-click kit bbb11db), DRAFT=mtp; CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 bash linux/start.sh --no-harness --no-pick (.env: MODEL_DIR=models/Qwen3.8-27B-EXL3-4.0bpw CONTEXT_SIZE=262144 CACHE_QUANT=4 GPU_MEM_GB=22.8 DRAFT=mtp PROFILE=4.0bpw-262k)

Context and sampling: 262144 (KV int4), seed 42, cache_prompt false (kit: not available). Sampling per part: speed and quality tests with thinking off and the Qwen model-card instruct sampling (temp 0.7 / top_p 0.8 / top_k 20 / min_p 0.0 / presence 1.5); GPQA 30 with thinking on and the model-card thinking sampling (temp 1.0 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 20 / min_p 0.0 / presence 0.0); build test with thinking on and the kit's own sampling (temp 0.6 / top_p 0.95 / top_k 20, kit README.md:497) in the agent harness the kit ships, DeepSeek Harness 0.1.3-alpha.2. Hardware: 1x RTX 5090 32 GB. All raw files of this setup: raw/v2/qwen38-27b-exl3-4-0bpw-mtp-5090.

Mia's sparkDash 2.50.0

Mia's own benchmark, run unchanged

This is Mia's own benchmark tool (commit 21a3511), run unchanged. It has its own section here and its own column on the class page, and it is never mixed with my numbers. A cut-off answer counts as wrong here, so a value can differ from sparkDash's own screen.

Tool Eval Quick
93/ 100
Decode, 1 request
267.7tok/s
TestResult95 % marginRightCut offcount as wrongRaw files
Quality QA
150 questions
79.3 % ± 6.4 pts119 / 1500summarycommand
Quality MMLU
285 questions
84.6 % ± 4.2 pts241 / 28523summarycommand
Tool Eval Quick
15 scenarios, tool use
93 / 10013 / 15 passed—tool eval result · tool eval report · tool eval command · summarycommand
Decode, 1 request at once
first token 108 ms
267.7 tok/s——decode result · summarycommand
Prefill at 4K
first token 1.3 s
3495.8 tok/s——prefill result · summarycommand
Prefill at 8K
first token 2.5 s
3441.9 tok/s——prefill result · summarycommand
Prefill at 16K
first token 5.1 s
3291.7 tok/s——prefill result · summarycommand
Prefill at 32K
first token 10.8 s
3055.5 tok/s——prefill result · summarycommand

Seed 1234 applies to the two quality tests; decode, prefill and tool eval send no seed. The benchmark client ran on a separate machine that is never part of the measured group. Measured 2026-10-19. Version 2.50.0, commit 21a3511.

QA. Quality QA, 150 items, seed 1234, temperature 0, thinking off, 4 requests at once (Mia's default). An answer cut off at the token limit counts as wrong. ± is the 95 % margin (Wilson).

MMLU. Quality MMLU, 285 items (5 for each of 57 subjects, 4 answers), seed 1234, temperature 0, thinking off. An answer cut off at the token limit counts as wrong. ± is the 95 % margin (Wilson).

Decode. Decode bench, 1 request at once, 400 tokens, prompt type structured, temperature 0, thinking off. No seed is sent.

Prefill. Prefill bench at 4K, 8K, 16K and 32K tokens. sparkDash skips a size that does not fit into the context. No seed is sent.

Tool Eval Quick. Tool Eval Quick: tool-eval-bench (SeraphimSerapis, commit c61319b), 15 core scenarios (--short), --no-think, --timeout 120. Score 0 to 100. No seed is sent.

Note from the run: sparkDash 2.50.0 (@21a3511) on a client machine (never in the measured group); Quality: seed 1234, temperature 0, thinking off, a truncated answer counts as wrong; decode, prefill and tool eval send no seed; own row, never mixed with quality-v2.

Exact commands we measured withfor reproducing↓

You do not need this to run the model. It is the exact command of our measurement, so anyone can repeat the result.

sparkDash (run sparkdash-r1)
python3 tools/quality2/sparkdash_client.py tools/quality2/cards/qwen38-27b-exl3-4.0bpw-mtp-5090.json <box> --client <client machine> --job tag-1910 --out $RUN
Tool Eval Quick, as sparkDash starts it
tool-eval-bench --base-url http://127.0.0.1:<port> --short --no-think --timeout 120 --json-file $BENCH/sparkdash-client/runs/run-sparkdash-r1/tooleval/result.json --no-live